The crimes of these people, of course, are relative and varied; for the most part, they demand, in various forms, the destruction of the present for the sake of a better future. But if he must, for the sake of his idea, step even over a corpse, over blood, then, inwardly, in his conscience, he may, in my view, grant himself permission to step over blood—depending, of course, on the idea and its scale—note that. In this sense only do I speak, in my article, of their right to crime. (Recall, after all, we began with a legal question.) That said, there’s little cause for alarm: the masses almost never recognize this right in them, punish them, and hang them (more or less), thus, quite justly, fulfilling their conservative purpose—yet with the added fact that in later generations, the same masses place the executed on a pedestal and worship them (more or less).